赢8娱乐糖果配对游戏-官方网站[welcome]


+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Comparison of single-incision plus one additional port laparoscopy-assisted anterior resection with conventional laparoscopy-assisted anterior resection for rectal cancer



Comparison of single-incision plus one additional port laparoscopy-assisted anterior resection with conventional laparoscopy-assisted anterior resection for rectal cancer



World Journal of Surgery 38(10): 2716-2723



Reduced-port laparoscopic surgery is the latest innovation in minimally invasive surgery. We performed single-incision plus one additional port laparoscopy-assisted anterior resection (SILS + 1-AR) starting in August 2010. This study aimed at evaluating the feasibility of SILS + 1-AR and comparing it with that of conventional laparoscopy-assisted anterior resection (C-AR). Patients with preoperative clinical stage 0 to stage III rectal cancer were included. Demographic, intraoperative, and pathological examination data, as well as short-term outcome data, of 20 patients who underwent SILS + 1-AR were retrospectively compared with that of 20 patients who underwent C-AR. Invasiveness of the two procedures was also evaluated through a vital signs diary and hematological examination on postoperative days (POD) 1, 3, and 7. Operating time, mean estimated blood loss, the number of lymph nodes dissected, the number of lymph node metastases, and the mean distal resection margin length were not significantly different. However, postoperative neutrophil counts in the SILS + 1-AR group were lower than those in the C-AR group (P = 0.085). A significant difference in body temperature was observed in the SILS + 1-AR group on POD 1 (P = 0.028). No significant differences were observed in perioperative and overall morbidity between the two groups. Conversion to open surgery was required in 2 (10 %) of the 20 patients in the SILS + 1-AR group. The mean postoperative length of stay and recurrence rates were similar in the two groups. SILS + 1-AR for rectal cancer is similar to C-AR in safety, feasibility, and provision of oncological radicality.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 052243235

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 24852437

DOI: 10.1007/s00268-014-2642-8


Related references

Laparoscopy-assisted posterior low anterior resection of rectal cancer. Bmc Gastroenterology 14: 158, 2014

Laparoscopy-assisted low anterior resection with a prolapsing technique for low rectal cancer. Surgery Today 35(7): 598-602, 2005

A Case of Right Brachial Plexus Palsy after Laparoscopy-assisted Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer. The Journal of Japan Society for Clinical Anesthesia 35(7): 729-733, 2015

Low anterior rectal resection by single port laparoscopy. Journal of Visceral Surgery 150(3): 189-193, 2013

Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopy-assisted triple-port anterior resection. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 21(7): 779-785, 2018

Port-site recurrence after laparoscopy-assisted low anterior resection: the sign of peritoneal dissemination. International Journal of Colorectal Disease 26(6): 809-810, 2011

Short-term clinical outcome of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopy. Surgical Endoscopy 27(1): 48-55, 2013

Down-to-up transanal rectal resection with total mesorectal excision assisted by?single-incision laparoscopy - a video vignette. Colorectal Disease 18(5): 517-518, 2016

Robotic Assisted Single Incision Ileocolic Resection Using Standard Robotic Instrumentation and a Single Incision Laparoscopy Surgery (Sils) Port. Gastroenterology 144(5): S-1056, 2013

Two-port laparoscopic anterior resection through a self-made glove device versus conventional laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparison of short-term surgical results. World Journal of Surgical Oncology 14(1): 275, 2016

Clinical outcomes of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison with conventional laparoscopy and multifactorial analysis of the learning curve for robotic surgery. International Journal of Colorectal Disease 29(5): 555-562, 2014

Single-incision plus one port laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer as a reduced port surgery. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery 101(4): 283-286, 2012

Triple-incision laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for the resection of gastric cancer: comparison with conventional laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery 7(3): 197-205, 2014

Single incision and reduced port laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: initial experience in 96 cases. Anz Journal of Surgery 86(5): 403-407, 2016

Resection of rectal cancer via an abdominal single-port access: short-term results and comparison with standard laparoscopy. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 56(11): 1203-1210, 2013





赢8娱乐糖果配对游戏 <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <文本链> <文本链> <文本链> <文本链> <文本链> <文本链>